Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • D digitec-wiki
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 0
    • Issues 0
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Digitec
  • digitec-wiki
  • Wiki
  • smells and heuristics conclusion

Last edited by Rene Cabral Mar 27, 2015
Page history

smells and heuristics conclusion

Home / Digitec Coding Practices / Global Coding Standards / Smells and Heuristics - Conclusion

◀ Tests

Conclusion

This list of heuristics and smells could hardly be said to be complete. Indeed, I'm not sure that such a list can ever be complete. But perhaps completeness should not be the goal, because what this list does do is imply a value system.

Indeed, that value system has been the goal, and the topic, of this book. Clean code is not written by following a set of rules. You don't become a software craftsman by learning a list of heuristics. Professionalism and craftsmanship come from values that drive disciplines.


◀ Tests

Clone repository
  • alpha beta testing
  • browser testing
  • camtasia licenses
  • code delivery processes
  • coding practices
  • css and sass coding standards
  • database schema standards
  • dependency management
  • development environments
  • digitec agile process
  • digitec gitlab styles
  • digitec software promises
  • digitec spec process
  • gitlab administration
  • gitlab issues tags
View All Pages